1. IM Robert Hess (6) 2545 - GM Varuzhan Akobian (5½) 2664
2. GM Hikaru Nakamura (6) 2757 - GM Joshua Friedel (5) 2568
3. GM Alexander Onischuk (5½) 2736 - IM Ray Robson (4½) 2542
4. GM Jaan Ehlvest (4) 2649 - GM Gata Kamsky (5½) 2798
5. GM Yury Shulman (4½) 2697 - GM Gregory Kaidanov (4) 2662
6. IM Enrico Sevillano (4) 2549 - GM Larry Christiansen (4) 2681
7. GM Joel Benjamin (4) 2650 - GM Alexander Shabalov (4) 2620
8. GM Ildar Ibragimov (4) 2628 - IM Michael Brooks (4) 2419
9. IM Samuel Shankland (3) 2464 - GM Boris Gulko (3½) 2631
10. GM Julio Becerra (3½) 2672 - GM Melikset Khachiyan (2½) 2632
11. Tyler Hughes (3) 2293 - FM Doug Eckert (2) 2278
12. IM Irina Krush (3) 2496 - Charles Lawton (½) 2350
these are the pairings and my prediction is in... Nakamura eats the enchilada (the same prediction I made at round 1 outset). Whether its by blitz' playoffs or outright he will be our titled champion.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Sunday, May 10, 2009
US Championship (with round2 photos) Trip
590 miles traveled on the great American interstate all with one thought in mind: viewing great chess games from the 2009 US Championship.
It turned out there was only one problem with that thought... "viewing." The very enthusiastic organizers of the St. Louis chess club must be applauded for their heart and effort... but condemned on their results. They created the most non friendly spectator environment I could ever have imagined. I could complain all day on the errors of these first time organizers... but I will chalk it all up to as a learning experience. I will say though that I finally understand the sentiment of just spectating from home. Nothing prevents the organizers from creating these non-spectator friendly environments. I will never again wonder about why chess is not a spectator friendly sport for I will always remember the setup of the 2009 US Championships. My friend and I decided to leave late on Saturday night after round 2 instead of staying for round 3 as originally planned as a result of the poor spectating conditions.
Even though the club staff did their best to prevent photos by taking away your camera and cellphone at the door... and constantly wanding you and patting you down like an airport security checkin point. I did manage to steal some illegal photos!
I hope that at least some people will enjoy my photos as I went to great lengths to dupe the stupid security guards. I would have videos as well but it seemed too risky.


A young future GM plays skittles prior to round2's start outside the club with a prestigious on looker: IM Michael Brooks!

Wall of photos of the 24 participants taken by Betsy Dynako.

GM Alexander Onischuk in deep thought against NM Tyler Hughes.

GM Melikset Khachiyan ponders his position in the winawer french against defending 2008 US Champion GM Yury Shulman of Chicago, IL!

Local NM Charles Lawton in deep thought against IM Enrico Sevillano.

The most interesting game of the round to participants... GM Joshua Friedel vs GM Gregory Kaidanov with GM Robert Hess, GM Alexander Onischuk and GM Alexander Shabalov spectating.

My favorite photo: IM Anna Zatonskih ponders her position in a very cat like posture... as the picture of IM Michael Brooks from the wall of photos stares on with her.
I have learned my lesson. No need to spectate live unless its your home town or a side event for you to play in.... because the last thing organizers think about is spectators.
It turned out there was only one problem with that thought... "viewing." The very enthusiastic organizers of the St. Louis chess club must be applauded for their heart and effort... but condemned on their results. They created the most non friendly spectator environment I could ever have imagined. I could complain all day on the errors of these first time organizers... but I will chalk it all up to as a learning experience. I will say though that I finally understand the sentiment of just spectating from home. Nothing prevents the organizers from creating these non-spectator friendly environments. I will never again wonder about why chess is not a spectator friendly sport for I will always remember the setup of the 2009 US Championships. My friend and I decided to leave late on Saturday night after round 2 instead of staying for round 3 as originally planned as a result of the poor spectating conditions.
Even though the club staff did their best to prevent photos by taking away your camera and cellphone at the door... and constantly wanding you and patting you down like an airport security checkin point. I did manage to steal some illegal photos!
I hope that at least some people will enjoy my photos as I went to great lengths to dupe the stupid security guards. I would have videos as well but it seemed too risky.


A young future GM plays skittles prior to round2's start outside the club with a prestigious on looker: IM Michael Brooks!

Wall of photos of the 24 participants taken by Betsy Dynako.

GM Alexander Onischuk in deep thought against NM Tyler Hughes.

GM Melikset Khachiyan ponders his position in the winawer french against defending 2008 US Champion GM Yury Shulman of Chicago, IL!

Local NM Charles Lawton in deep thought against IM Enrico Sevillano.

The most interesting game of the round to participants... GM Joshua Friedel vs GM Gregory Kaidanov with GM Robert Hess, GM Alexander Onischuk and GM Alexander Shabalov spectating.

My favorite photo: IM Anna Zatonskih ponders her position in a very cat like posture... as the picture of IM Michael Brooks from the wall of photos stares on with her.
I have learned my lesson. No need to spectate live unless its your home town or a side event for you to play in.... because the last thing organizers think about is spectators.
Friday, May 8, 2009
US Championship round 1!
I will be driving down to St. Louis to watch round1&2&3. Round 1 pairings are posted here
Pairings
Round 1, Friday, May 8, 2:00 pm
Bd White Black
1. GM Ibragimov, Ildar (0.0) 2628 - GM Kamsky, Gata (0.0) 2798
2. GM Nakamura, Hikaru (0.0) 2757 - GM Shabalov, Alexander (0.0) 2620
3. GM Friedel, Joshua (0.0) 2568 - GM Onischuk, Alexander (0.0) 2736
4. GM Shulman, Yury (0.0) 2697 - IM Sevillano, Enrico (0.0) 2549
5. IM Hess, Robert (0.0) 2545 - GM Christiansen, Larry (0.0) 2681
6. GM Becerra, Julio (0.0) 2672 - IM Robson, Ray (0.0) 2542
7. IM Zatonskih, Anna (0.0) 2503 - GM Akobian, Varuzhan (0.0) 2664
8. GM Kaidanov, Gregory (0.0) 2662 - IM Krush, Irina (0.0) 2496
9. IM Shankland, Samuel (0.0) 2464 - GM Benjamin, Joel (0.0) 2650
10. GM Ehlvest, Jaan (0.0) 2649 - IM Brooks, Michael (0.0) 2419
11. Lawton, Charles (0.0) 2350 - GM Khachiyan, Melikset (0.0) 2632
12. GM Gulko, Boris (0.0) 2631 - Hughes, Tyler (0.0) 2293
I have bolded the round 1 matches I consider extremely interesting (as in results not totally predictable and obvious!). I am rooting for Shulman and Christiansen but I predict Nakamura will eat the whole enchilada. I don't doubt strong guns like Onsichuk and Kamsky... but my true desire would be to see Robson score his first GM norm!
This field is the strongest US championship ever with 8 former US Champions participating!
Check back later for pictures!
Pairings
Round 1, Friday, May 8, 2:00 pm
Bd White Black
1. GM Ibragimov, Ildar (0.0) 2628 - GM Kamsky, Gata (0.0) 2798
2. GM Nakamura, Hikaru (0.0) 2757 - GM Shabalov, Alexander (0.0) 2620
3. GM Friedel, Joshua (0.0) 2568 - GM Onischuk, Alexander (0.0) 2736
4. GM Shulman, Yury (0.0) 2697 - IM Sevillano, Enrico (0.0) 2549
5. IM Hess, Robert (0.0) 2545 - GM Christiansen, Larry (0.0) 2681
6. GM Becerra, Julio (0.0) 2672 - IM Robson, Ray (0.0) 2542
7. IM Zatonskih, Anna (0.0) 2503 - GM Akobian, Varuzhan (0.0) 2664
8. GM Kaidanov, Gregory (0.0) 2662 - IM Krush, Irina (0.0) 2496
9. IM Shankland, Samuel (0.0) 2464 - GM Benjamin, Joel (0.0) 2650
10. GM Ehlvest, Jaan (0.0) 2649 - IM Brooks, Michael (0.0) 2419
11. Lawton, Charles (0.0) 2350 - GM Khachiyan, Melikset (0.0) 2632
12. GM Gulko, Boris (0.0) 2631 - Hughes, Tyler (0.0) 2293
I have bolded the round 1 matches I consider extremely interesting (as in results not totally predictable and obvious!). I am rooting for Shulman and Christiansen but I predict Nakamura will eat the whole enchilada. I don't doubt strong guns like Onsichuk and Kamsky... but my true desire would be to see Robson score his first GM norm!
This field is the strongest US championship ever with 8 former US Champions participating!
Check back later for pictures!
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Chess Improvement
At a tournament this weekend, I received many compliments on my own personal chess improvement. I'm used to this by now due to the rapid increase of my rating. However, someone actually suggested I write a book! I don't think there is a publisher that really would take me on :)
However, I will relate a few tips. My chess training program is designed for the busy person (I go to work full time, school full time AND still play chess and hangout with friends though I have no family... one could presumably substitute either school or job for this kind of commitment).
My goal is to start and end the day with chess! If you are going to expect to improve at something you must give it some of your free time (I would hope this is not a ground shattering idea). I do this by starting the day with 15-30minutes of correspondence chess and ending the day with 15-30minutes of Endgames (and I usually fit in 15-30 minutes of tactics either during or after my workouts).
The result is I spend 45minutes to an hour and half on chess a day. This is not a huge amount of time. Especially if you consider all the time you waste during the course of a day. If you need to pick your kids up from school just throw a chess tactic book in the car. While you wait for the kids to come out just do 5-10 minutes of the book. Whatever you get done, great! This time adds up over a long period. 45minutes is basically what you should be doing to workout (stay in shape!) cook dinner (if you do cook) or probably a fraction of the tv you watch in a given day.
I understand "rapid chess improvement" advocated 8hours of chess a day. My program is designed for a busy person but still to touch on all the key components of chess: Tactics, endgames and well playing full games! However, the twist is the correspondence. It forces you to spend sometimes 30 minutes several days in a row on ONE position. It will teach you patience and FORCE you to learn your openings. It is the real deal. I play about 12-100 games of correspondence at once (right now 50 and trying to cut back to 24). But you know as you get real busy in life you just ignore the games for a week or two. When you have alot of free time instead of 15 minutes spend 2 hours. It is the beauty of correspondence how easily it can be fit into your personal schedule. I recommend for starters to get no more than 6 games going to see how long you will personally need on the games. I use http://www.ficgs.com/index_affiliate.php?ref=265966 to play. However, there is a whole slew of correspondence sites on my links to the left. You only need one site! The key differences will be web layout, pay site, strength of opponents and different options of play (time control/variants).
Believe me 45minutes a day can add up to major improvement over a couple of months!
However, I will relate a few tips. My chess training program is designed for the busy person (I go to work full time, school full time AND still play chess and hangout with friends though I have no family... one could presumably substitute either school or job for this kind of commitment).
My goal is to start and end the day with chess! If you are going to expect to improve at something you must give it some of your free time (I would hope this is not a ground shattering idea). I do this by starting the day with 15-30minutes of correspondence chess and ending the day with 15-30minutes of Endgames (and I usually fit in 15-30 minutes of tactics either during or after my workouts).
The result is I spend 45minutes to an hour and half on chess a day. This is not a huge amount of time. Especially if you consider all the time you waste during the course of a day. If you need to pick your kids up from school just throw a chess tactic book in the car. While you wait for the kids to come out just do 5-10 minutes of the book. Whatever you get done, great! This time adds up over a long period. 45minutes is basically what you should be doing to workout (stay in shape!) cook dinner (if you do cook) or probably a fraction of the tv you watch in a given day.
I understand "rapid chess improvement" advocated 8hours of chess a day. My program is designed for a busy person but still to touch on all the key components of chess: Tactics, endgames and well playing full games! However, the twist is the correspondence. It forces you to spend sometimes 30 minutes several days in a row on ONE position. It will teach you patience and FORCE you to learn your openings. It is the real deal. I play about 12-100 games of correspondence at once (right now 50 and trying to cut back to 24). But you know as you get real busy in life you just ignore the games for a week or two. When you have alot of free time instead of 15 minutes spend 2 hours. It is the beauty of correspondence how easily it can be fit into your personal schedule. I recommend for starters to get no more than 6 games going to see how long you will personally need on the games. I use http://www.ficgs.com/index_affiliate.php?ref=265966 to play. However, there is a whole slew of correspondence sites on my links to the left. You only need one site! The key differences will be web layout, pay site, strength of opponents and different options of play (time control/variants).
Believe me 45minutes a day can add up to major improvement over a couple of months!
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Solution
Monday, April 6, 2009
Sacrifices
In chess sacrifice goals seem simple. You sacrifice material (usually) now for either mate or a huge material surplus in a few moves. It always feels wonderful to see sacrifices pay off but they can often be hard to calculate and visualize correctly. However, chess sacrifices seem simple compared with sacrifices in your daily life! In day to day affairs, one can not even be entirely sure what the end goal of a sacrifice is. Do you give up time for family or friends? Do you give up a hobby for another hobby? Do you go back to school now at a highcost for a good return in better job offers later? And so... it can become even more complex as you are not reasonably sure your compensation will ever materialize... therefore, it seems prudent to appreciate sacrifices in chess even more because their result can never be questioned.
With that, I bring a position directly from Vukovic's Art of Attack (p158).

answer to be posted later!
With that, I bring a position directly from Vukovic's Art of Attack (p158).

answer to be posted later!
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Who said Chess players can't Dance! Well Hula
Apparently WIM Arianne Caolli isn't the only chess player that can Dance (that is if you consider Hula dancing). WGM Jennifer Shahade might have even one uped her by hulaing while simuling! Enjoy the following clip:
Untitled from jennifer shahade on Vimeo.
Raises a good question about multitasking now doesn't it? I guess while calculating all those variations on all those boards it would be nice to have a stress relieving hula going on! Probably creates a very nice fun environment not normally seen in chess playing halls!
Untitled from jennifer shahade on Vimeo.
Raises a good question about multitasking now doesn't it? I guess while calculating all those variations on all those boards it would be nice to have a stress relieving hula going on! Probably creates a very nice fun environment not normally seen in chess playing halls!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
